ANALYSIS

Hi again! I am here the for the last time to write my last entry about the book "Holes".To be honest i liked writing blog.I didn't expect it but it's true.Anyway let's start with the analysis.

First of all i must say i liked the book so much.Because the plot is interesting and the book fluent and well-structured.Three another story which happened in different times were good connected with each other and that made the book more interesting and thrilling.By the way there are many flashbacks in the book.Sometimes the writer ended a chapter and in the next chapter he wrote about a story which happened 100 years ago.That's why the book wasn't boring.

I liked the ending of the book,because i like happy ends.I think especially Zero deserved happiness. Nevertheless i can't decide which one is my favourite character.Stanley or Zero? I don't know.

The themes that the writer wrote about are destiny,luck,friendship,love,racism,hope and poverty. Besides i like the writing style of the writer.Otherwise the book can't be fluent.At the end of the book Louis Sachar didn't go through all the details of all the changes in the characters' lives not to be boring.He wanted us to"fill in the holes" ourselves.I liked that part.He also used sometimes repetition in the book.For example the song ,which Elya Yelnats had to sing to a pig and the word"dirty-rotten-pig-stealing-great-grandfather" was repeated too.

"If only,if only"the woodpecker sighs,

"The bark on the tree was just a little bit softer."

While the wolf waits below,hungry and lonely.

He cries to the moo-oo-oon,

"ı"f only,if only."



  

"Behind them the sky had turned dark,and for the first time in over a hundred years,a drop of rain fell into the empty lake."(p176)

                                                                                   (259 w)